Sunday, December 2, 2018

SharonScarrellaAndersonvsCitySt.Paul,RamseyCo.ConstitutionalityExcessiveConsumption2018

                Sun.2Dec2018
              LEGAL NOTICE AFFIANT VA WIDOW,WHISTLEBLOWER WHITE WOMAN IN PROTECTED CLASS GIVES  NOTICE TO BE PLACED ON THE ST. PAUL CITY AGENDA WED5DEC.2018. via E Commerce,Social Media, Evidence on over 100 Blogs,Google,FB,Twitter etc.

               AFFIANT MRS. SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON AKA SCARRELLA
HAS 4 DECADES EXPOSED THE CITY ST. PAUL,MN PONZI TAXING,FEES,INTEREST ON PRIVATE HOMESTEAD PROPERTYS.
                              Exploiting the Disabled,Vunerable,Seniors,Candidate4MNAG, non-lawyers,constituting Elder Abuse by the City St. Paul,Ramsey Co et al.

                            Political Abuse,as Sharon is Loyal Trump Supporter and a Republican,Commerce, Anti trust, triggering Deceptive Trade Practices, vs. Citizenery.
Reducing to Poverty.
                            Tracking DFL Chair Tom Perez former USAsstAttorney,then Hud Commissioner, current DFL Chair making Heinous Deals to undermine the USA and Trump Presidency, which he and Muslin Keith Ellison are Guilty of Treason, High Crimes and Misdemeanors. acting in concort with David Lillhaug, Sara Grewing, bribes as Justice and Judge 2nd District.

            The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct by officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, refusal to obey a lawful order, chronic intoxication, and tax evasion. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.               













Tom Perez KingPin DaddyoftheDFL Lawyer must be brought to the Bar of Justice 4 his Deception re USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallager http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to

Newell’s lawsuit against the City  The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.
Related image
                     697 Surrey Ave
Citys Endorsement of Muslin Keith Ellison is Contrary to Christian Beliefs and Constitutional Guarantees, Affiant must not subject to Quran or Sharia Law.
Murder of Cpl Jim Anderson 21Sept2000

      http://taxthemax.blogspot.com Thous of Forensic Files http://sharon4anderson.org thousand of pic's pdf files unabated by Government Officials,


Affiant VA Widow White Whistlelower take umbrage with the City st. Paul,MN Employees
for decades have Violated Sharon Anderson aka Peterson,Scarrella State,Federal Constitutional
Rights, with Libel, Slander as Candidate 4 MNAG vs. Muslin Keith Ellison http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

Civil rights" are the rights of all individuals to receive equal treatment under state and federal laws.
Many of the laws protecting civil rights -- particularly the Civil Rights Act of 1964 --
prohibit discrimination in housing (including landlord-tenant relationships),
access to credit, education, public accommodations, and employment.
Federal civil rights laws apply to all states, but some
Uniform Commercial Code - Wikipediastate civil rights laws
provide additional protections for workers and other individuals.

THEREFORE; Affiant demands all Just Compensation for herself and Frank steinhauser, et al   Constitutionality of Excessive Consumption taken without Valid Complaints,Warrants,Tickets signed by a City Attorney to Prosecute etc.
                      Disclaimer; Sharon ran vs. Lori Swanson for AG based on Lorys wilful neglience to Write Amicus Brief in Magner vs. Gallagher.
                      Murder of Sharons 2nd Husband Cpl.JimAnderson Korea Silver Star,Purple heart 21Sept2000.
                   

                   
landlords vs city st paul minnesota case brief - Google Search
PH 18-5145Truth in Taxation hearingPublic Hearing-

Case of landlords vs. city winds back to St. Paul - StarTribune.com

www.startribune.com/case-of-landlords-vs-city-winds-back-to-st-paul/172023641/

sharon4anderson blogger briefs on blogs - Google Search
Sep 30, 2012 - Case of landlords vs. city winds back to St. Paul ... said that he called St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman after University of Minnesota law professor ...
Other Important Laws - Landlords & Tenants | The Office of Attorney General Lori Swanson

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

















LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, November 2, 2018

IllegalssueTrumpetalBuildtheWall


Democratic AGs didn’t invent this strategy. Republican attorneys general frequently challenged Obama administration policies on the Affordable Care Act and immigration, including a pending lawsuit that seeks to have what remains of ACA ruled unconstitutional. Former Texas AG Greg Abbott, now the state’s governor, once said of his duties: “I go into the office, I sue the federal government, and I go home.”


From: sharon4anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, bill4dahn@aol.com, dschultz@gw.hamline.edu, kfeatherly@minnlawyer.com, bbierschbach@minnpost.com, billy@right.voter.com
Sent: 11/2/2018 12:19:24 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Check out 11-1-18-Pineda-v-Trump-Complaint.pdf
                                    Fri.2Nov2018
11-1-18-Pineda-v-Trump-Complaint.pdf
                      To the Above Named;  Its never over Illegals vs. Soverign Homegrown,Homeowners.
                  http://freedom-4you.blogspot.com
                  IN THE MATTER OF MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON AND TOM PEREZ
                            Nov. 6th 2018 General Elections

609.901 CONSTRUCTION OF RACKETEERING PROVISIONS.

Sections 609.902 to 609.912 shall be liberally construed to achieve their remedial purposes of curtailing racketeering activity and controlled substance crime and lessening their economic and political power in Minnesota.
                         Affiant Comes now as QuiTam Whistleblower, Private AG     VA WIDOW,WHISTLEBLOWER WHITE WOMAN MRS. SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSONAKA SCARRELLA
                           hereinafter MKE  cannot hold the Constitutional Office of MNAG PURSUANT TO DFL NATIONAL CHAIR TOM PEREZ AND
 Muslin Religion may now be a Rico Enterprise, any persons endorsing MKE is also endorsing the Muslins who owe Allegience to Allah and not to Oath of Office to support and defend USA Constitution.

QURAN VERSUS THE CONSTITUTION - Free Republic
www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3339861/posts
Sep 22, 2015 - 20 posts - ‎16 authors
Quran vs. Constitution: Why they're incompatible Exclusive: William Federer compares documents amendment by amendment Published: ...


                      
                                   CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I Claim for Declaratory Relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 due to violating Due Process Clause 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Claim for Declaratory relief against all Defendants in their official capacitie

COUNT II Claim for Declaratory Relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 for violation of Procedural Due Process Clause 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Claim for Declaratory relief against all Defendants in their official
capacities)

COUNT III Claim for Declaratory Relief for violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C), by disregarding the requirements of, inter alia, 8 U.S.C. § 1225; 8 U.S.C. § 1182; 8 CFR § 1201 ICE Directive No. 11002.1; and the Flores Agreement (Claim for Declaratory relief against Defendants Sessions, Nielsen, and McAleenan in






Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

RICOComplaintsvsDFLMuslinKeithEllisonTomPerezElectionContest6Nov2018

                               Tues.16Oct2018   Complaint under Construction will decend to particulars.
                               ON THE GRAVES OF MY CHRISTIAN HERITAGE
                                 CANNOT WALK AWAY.
                 To the Abov/e Named in their Personal and Official Capacity Police Chief Todd Axtell and John Choi, both refuse to Answer,

                  IN THE MATTER OF MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON AND TOM PEREZ
                            Nov. 6th 2018 General Elections

609.901 CONSTRUCTION OF RACKETEERING PROVISIONS.

Sections 609.902 to 609.912 shall be liberally construed to achieve their remedial purposes of curtailing racketeering activity and controlled substance crime and lessening their economic and political power in Minnesota.
                         Affiant Comes now as QuiTam Whistleblower, Private AG     VA WIDOW,WHISTLEBLOWER WHITE WOMAN MRS. SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSONAKA SCARRELLA
                           hereinafter MKE  cannot hold the Constitutional Office of MNAG PURSUANT TO DFL NATIONAL CHAIR TOM PEREZ AND
 Muslin Religion may now be a Rico Enterprise, any persons endorsing MKE is also endorsing the Muslins who owe Allegience to Allah and not to Oath of Office to support and defend USA Constitution.

QURAN VERSUS THE CONSTITUTION - Free Republic
www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3339861/posts
Sep 22, 2015 - 20 posts - ‎16 authors
Quran vs. Constitution: Why they're incompatible Exclusive: William Federer compares documents amendment by amendment Published: ...

                                        COUNT I https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/rico/


                 

                         Brings into Play Major Housing/Election Issues  trickled down to the Constitutional Office of MNAG, UNABATED by Current AG DFL Lori Swanson and will be continued if Muslin Keith Ellison is Elected 4 MNAG, well known Quoran and Sharia Law Hate Lesbians and Gays,
                  Perhaps the Hon Michelle MacDonald is worried on the Constitutional Issues to Protect the Gay and Lesbian Community


In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.


The facts surrounding this quid pro quo show that Perez may have exceeded the scope of the ethics and professional responsibility opinions he received from the Department and thereby violated his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the United States. Perez also misled senior Justice Department officials about the quid pro quo when he misinformed then-Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli about the reasons for Magner’s withdrawal. The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota,
                    
Chief Justice - Supreme Court
Candidate NamePartyWebsiteFile Date
Lorie Skjerven GildeaNonpartisanwww.chiefjusticeloriegildea.com5/22/2018

                           
Attorney General
Candidate NamePartyWebsiteFile Date
Sharon AndersonRepublicanhttp://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com5/23/2018
Robert LessardRepublican6/5/2018
Doug WardlowRepublicanwww.dougwardlowag.com6/4/2018
Keith EllisonDemocratic-Farmer-Laborhttps://keithellison.org

 TO THE ABOVE NAMED, MEDIA,
Associate Justice - Supreme Court 2
Candidate NamePartyWebsiteFile Date
Margaret ChutichNonpartisanjusticemargaretchutich.org5/22/2018
Michelle MacDonaldNonpartisanwww.macdonaldforjustice.com6/5/2018
Justice Lori Gildea on Ballot unopposed as are others.


Video link:
As I described in my book “The Deep State,” one of the key moments that led to my early departure from Congress and the House Oversight Committee came when Sessions inexplicably refused to prosecute subversions of congressional authority. I knew what that decision would cost Congress and the public.Without enforcement of congressional subpoenas, the impotence of Congress to compel evidence is revealed. And the ability to perform substantive oversight is compromised
CandidateTotal amount raised Cash on hand 
Keith Ellison$675,720$335,247
Doug Wardlow$425,762$239,259
Noah Johnson$100$74
Oct. 16, 2018, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning today issued the following statement upon signing onto the Conservative Action Project letter to Congress in support of the MERIT Act to expedite the firing of federal employees: https://getliberty.org/
“Congress needs to pass the MERIT Act during the post-election lame duck session.  More than one hundred conservative leaders agree, signing the ‘Now is the time to pass the MERIT Act’ memo to Congress that was released today.
Data from Jan 1st, 2018 through Sep 18th, 2018


                                   THEREFORE AFFIANT IN THE INTEREST OF HONEST GOVERNMENT FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD HEREBY SUBMIT CRIMINAL CHARGES VS. DFL PARTY, DFL NAT. CHAIR TOM PEREZ AND V CHAIR MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON.
                            FURTHER AFFIANT ALLEGES THE HARRASSMENT BY CITY ST. PAUL IS BECAUSE SHARON IS LOYAL DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTER.  HAS OVERPAID PROPERTY TAXES AND MUST QUALIFY FOR REFUND, SHARON HAS BEEN REDUCED TO POVERTY.
​
First Half Due 05-15-2018
Amount Due$764.00
Penalty & Fees (thru current month)$0.00 
Sub Total$764.00
Payments Made($764.00)
Balance Due$0.00

Total Due     $0.00
Second Half Due 10-15-2018
Amount Due$764.00
Penalty & Fees (thru current month)$0.00 
Sub Total$764.00
Payments Made($764.00)
Balance Due$0.00



322922410053 SHARON LEE ANDERSON697 SURREY AVE
  Current Candidate MNAG 




























Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, September 9, 2018

QuirkyVAWidowWhistleSharon4Anderson4MNAG

Home / All News / Quirky candidate Anderson’s running for AG—again
Ballot box

Quirky candidate Anderson’s running for AG—again

By: Kevin Featherly August 9, 2018 0
Anyone spending an hour interviewing Minnesota attorney general candidate Sharon Anderson is likely to wish a libel lawyer were present.
We can’t repeat the various allegations, old and new, that the Republican hopeful lodged in an hour-long Aug. 2 interview. Which is to say, we can’t relate a lot of what she has to say. But here’s one relativelybenign sample:
“I’ve been thrown in jail, thrown in nut wards,” Anderson said. “They’re trying to bug me in this house. I’ve been reduced to poverty. They tried to hack my computer with my Windows 10.”
Alone among nine candidates in this profile series, Anderson declined to meet or be photographed. As a partial explanation for that, she said that she recently heard radio host Rush Limbaugh say on air that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders now needs a security detail. Anderson, obviously, has no such luxury.
“Now, I’m not big and important like that,” she said. “But I do rock a lot of boats with a lot of people.”
A lot of people rock boats with her, too.
Over decades, Anderson has filed voluminous lawsuits against judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, elected officials and banks. She remains perpetually miffed with the authorities who evicted her from her St. Paul Summit Avenue residence in 1988 for failing to pay property taxes. (She says she can prove she paid up and that the property remains hers.)
Though she began running for office at least a decade before that, her eviction is at the root of a perpetual quest to attack public malfeasance, using the ballot box.
“How am I, with no money, going to expose government corruption?” she said. “Only by being a candidate.” She already looks ahead to her next race for St. Paul City Council, she said.
Anderson remains vexed, too, by her 1996 arrest in Itasca County on terroristic threat and harassment charges, which led to 94 days in a psychiatric ward. Eventually a judge released her after finding her in partial remission from her illness.
One positive came from that experience—a campaign slogan. “I am the only certified sane candidate,” Anderson says happily. She has had made the most of her motto.
Anderson has run for everything from state House to Minnesota Supreme Court justice, even U.S. president. Her electoral record roughly parallels her trial record; she rarely comes close to winning. She has, however, cracked 30 percent at the polls nine times, most recently in a 2016 state Senate race.
And she can look back on one startling triumph. In 1994, Anderson beat Tom Neuville in the attorney general’s race primary. Neuville, then a state senator, retired in January from his job as a Rice County district court judge.
Surprisingly, Anderson said she found that experience rather joyless. She can think of only one moment she really liked—being interviewed in radio talk show host Barbara Carlson’s famous hot tub. “That was fun!” she said.
Exposing corruption
Anderson can be disarmingly warm when talking of her hosta plants or the kitty mewing in the background. But she can shock, too. The figures who populate her Centaurus-like constellation of grievances, for example, often get indecorous appellations attached to their names—“the Muslim,” “the lesbian,” “the black man.”
Sometimes she moves from one mood extreme to the other in a single ping-pong paragraph of dialogue. “I know I am hard to follow,” she said. “But I have 40 years of evidence on all this stuff.”
Her life’s purpose is to lay all that evidence out to the public, revealing government abuses that she says have been visited on her and other people—like convicted parental-rights violator Sandra Grazzini-Rucki—whose causes she champions. You can look up those manifold allegations on her campaign web site, blog postings and long litigation trail. We’ll refrain—that libel attorney is still not handy.
While she acknowledges winning is not her aim, Anderson claims she is “more serious” than usual about this race. For that, she cites twin causes: Donald Trump and Keith Ellison.
“I am loyal to Donald Trump,” Anderson swoons. “I love that man. I love his family.”
She calls the president her “mentor,” though one wonders if the reverse couldn’t be true. Her innovative 1994 campaign promise to throw Skip Humphrey in prison for treason predates the Trumpian “Lock her up!” chant by two full decades.
Her feelings toward Ellison are noticeably less rhapsodic. Because of his religion, she said, Ellison is unqualified to be attorney general. If he should win, she fears being recast as a “second-class citizen.”
“Ellison is a Muslim,” she says dispositively. “How can a Muslim take an oath to support and defend the United States Constitution? He can’t. He owes his allegiance to the Quran and to sharia law.”
She cannot be convinced that Islam’s followers constitute no unified, purpose-driven bloc in opposition to her politics. “There is only one kind of Muslim that I know of,” Anderson said.
We feel morally obliged to point out that she is wrong. To state the obvious, Sunnis, Shiites and Sufis are three major Islamic variants of Islam and they have major doctrinal differences. Ellison reportedly identifies as Sunni.
Likewise, it’s untrue that Muslims uniformly agree on sharia. According to a 39-country Pew Research Center poll in 2013, adherents tend to view sharia as “the revealed word of God” rather than “a body of law.” Even where “sharia law” is thought desirable, there are few countries where a majority believes that law should apply to Muslim and non-Muslim alike.
Not that railing against his religion is her only strategy for derailing the Ellison campaign train.
She said she recently petitioned the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to get Ellison’s law license revoked. Doing so ignores an irony—Anderson is herself no attorney. In fact, she harbors deep animus toward pretty much all lawyers and declares she doesn’t need to be one to serve as AG. (She’s right that it’s not required.)
The lawyers’ board did not share its reply to Anderson’s complaint. But Anderson read part of it aloud over the phone.
It said she accuses Ellison of using his congressional office and attorney general candidacy “to attack President Trump and incite violence.” She also charged that Ellison’s conduct “constitutes treason” and “violates the separation of powers doctrine.”
Anderson said the board won’t investigate her complaint. Its website shows that Ellison is current on his Minnesota registration fees as of January 2018. It also indicates that he voluntarily requested his Minnesota license be inactivated because he hasn’t kept up on local CLE credits.
If he did that, he’d be immediately reinstated, a board spokeswoman said.
AG ambitions
Not all of Anderson’s goals involve Ellison. In fact, should she somehow manage once again to Neuville the competition, she has other big plans.
Atop her list, Anderson wants somehow to revive Magner v. Gallagher, a St. Paul fair housing case that the U.S. Supreme Court accepted in 2011, but never heard because the parties agreed to a dismissal.
Anderson blames that outcome on the machinations of former assistant U.S. attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez. Perez is now chair of the Democratic National Committee—where Ellison is deputy chair. So he is implicated, too. “I call them the Obama boys,” she said.
Anderson also wants to eliminate all of Minnesota’s 87 county attorneys and its city attorneys. In their place, 10 statewide district attorneys would be appointed under her command. Why do that? “Because we are over-lawed and over-lawyered,” she said. “I believe that we do not need all these lawyers.”
Further, she would forcefully utilize parens patrie (“parent of the fatherland”). The legal precept allows state attorneys general to, for example, sue private companies on behalf of citizens for monetary damages, in a manner similar to class actions.
So, again, why? “Because we wouldn’t have all these family court squabbles, let’s put it that way,” she said.
Anderson additionally wants to impeach some judges and accomplish various other things besides. She knows she is never going to make any of it happen. But it doesn’t matter because, to Anderson, more than personal ambition is at stake.
“I’m not going to win the election,” Anderson said. “But let’s hope to God that we win the war for Donald Trump.”
Name: Sharon Anderson
Age: Not available
Lives in: Not available
Education: “School of hard knocks.”
Family: Widowed. One daughter, seven grandchildren.
Hobbies: Politics.
Surprising fact: “The only addiction that I have is this computer. My computer is my main man.”

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

CommittmentPanelJusticeGildea2019

Administrative - Order - Me... by Sharon Anderson on Scribd

Facebook Badge

Sharon Anderson | Create Your Badge

Muslin Keith Ellison Treason