Subject: CitySt.Paul File #: RES 19-1597Wed2Oct2019RICO-AmyBrendmoenakaNeskeakaHahm
Sharon Anderson Ward 2 Name: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson
Freedom-4You Mon 30Sept2019
Legal Whistleblower QuiTam Relator Candidate Sharon Anderson triggers Valid Complaints vs. Amy Brendmoen aka Neske aka Hahm, Lyn Moser John Doe,Mary Roe
To Mayor Melvin Carter,City Attorneys,Police,Sheriffs State Auditor et al
Sharons Claim City Officials sending Bogus,Blind Invoices, unsigned, via US Mails, triggering Stale Dated Resolution without decending to particulars, describing in Detail What Public Improvements were alleged to trigger any/all Inspections.
Saint Paul
s, mainly Blind Excessive Inspections.
Saint Paul
CAUSES OF ACTION Amy, Lyn Moser City Financial Servicres et al Attempt to influence Elections local Sharon4Council Ward 2 and Trump 2020.
COUNT 1 Abuse of Office, Employment
Affiants Candidate Widow,Whistleblower Candidate Mrs. Sharon Anderson aka Peterson aka Scarrella, interests are the Disparity of Private Lawyers. City Attorneys and David Lillhaug given Judgship in 2nd Judicial and MN Supreme Court.
COUNT II Constitutionality of Excessive Inspections
then Ruling on Fees,Taxes,Row vs. City St. Paul. Sarah Grewing and
David Lillhaug making Dirty Deals with City St. Paul re USSC 10-1032
AS a Private Lawyer complicit with DFL Nat.Chair Tom Perez
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and sm
COUNT III
When the presumption of validity afforded the assessment is rebutted, a district court has a duty as fact-finder to independently determine whether the amount of an assessment exceeds the special benefits to the property.
1998 stealing Propertys up to including 2019. http://sharon4anderson.org
COUNT IV Claim for Declaratory Relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 due to violating Due Process Clause 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Claim for Declaratory relief against all Defendants in their official capacitie
COUNT V Claim for Declaratory Relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 for violation of Procedural Due Process Clause 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Claim for Declaratory relief against all Defendants in their official
capacities)
COUNT VI Claim for Declaratory Relief for violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C), by disregarding the requirements of, inter alia, 8 U.S.C. § 1225; 8 U.S.C. § 1182; 8 CFR § 1201 ICE Directive No. 11002.1; and the Flores Agreement (Claim for Declaratory relief against Defendants Sessions, Nielsen, and McAleenan
a. Relative to Citys Immigration Policys, Trump Bashing etc.
THEREFORE; Amy Brodmen must be removed from Office pending State and Federal Investigations, Manulipating, Ratifying,Certificy on Blind Allegations, of Excessive Inspections.
Techinally Insider Trading on Blind Inspections, to Steal Propertys,Condemn,Disable and 24% increase on Levy on Blind Trash Litigation.
Illegal use of Interest 3.6 now 4.5 to inflate, threaten Citizenery.
Further Election,Vote Fraud against Senior,Disabled,Valid Whistleblower, Trump Supporter Mrs. Sharon L Anderson
Trust Trilogy
Sharons trusttrilogy
Sharons trusttrilogy
AFFIANT WIDOW-WHISTLEBLOWER MRS.SHARON ANDERSON Gives Legal Notice Again
via E-mail,Blogs,Social MEDIA again of the apparant Criminal Activities every Wed. via Excessive Inspections over 100 blogs,pdf Decades of Files
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
SHARON-MN-ECF
Sicko-City StPaul
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
SHARON-MN-ECF
Sicko-City StPaul
Sharons Ward 2 Candidate must expose DARK DFL Nat.Chair Tom Perez,former VC Muslim Keith Ellison, with former Aide Mitra Nelson, current VC Ken Martin his wife ORourke works in the County triggers , Citys Ponzi Fee,Excessive Inspections Taxing to Steal Realestate, Cars,Trailers,Personal Propertys via Weekly Consent Agenda
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates
| RES 19-1597 Version: 1 | Name: | Excessive/Abatement Services May 22 to June 21, 2019 |
| Type: | Resolution | Status: | Agenda Ready |
| In control: | City Council |
| Final action: |
| Title: | Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during May 22 to June 21, 2019, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for November 5, 2019 and City Council public hearing for January 22, 2020 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J2003E, Assessment No. 208302) |
| Sponsors: | Amy Brendmoen |
| Attachments: | 1. Report of Completion J2003E, 2. Assessment Roll J2003E |
|
Sharon4Council: City St.PaulBudgets -Constitutionally Challenged by Sharon Anderson-BillDahn
697 Surrey Av
St Paul MN 55106-5521
*697 SURREY AVE
*Ward: 7
*Pending as of: 8/1/2019
LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46
Excessive Inspection 1.00 122.00 $122.00 32-29-22-41-0053
Real Estate Admin Fee 35.00 1.00 $35.00
$157.00
*** Owner and Taxpayer ***
MEMORANDUM
2007 Candidate 64
42 USC 3631 20.5% increase 697 SurreySingleFamily is Bizzare, 90 % cops do not reside in the city or the county, Cops ie: Don Luna former city clerk refuses to take our criminal charges of Stolen Cars, Trailers, then over $2 thous assessments on the propertys is HEINOUR, Fraudulent 325 N.Wilder 6unit Conveyances
2194MarshallDuplex 448Desnoyer Duplex 1058Summit_Tax2007
BUDGETS RATIFIED BASED ON REPREHENSIBLE, REPUGNANT CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF FRAUD,MURDER,DISABILITIES, DISPARITIES ,DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS'S ILLEGAL Vacant Buildings1,553 Dec_ 2007 JAILINGS, ILLEGAL FORCLOSURE SALES, VACANT BUILDINGS TAXED NOT OCCUPIED IS QUESTIONABLE PENDING State & Federal LITIGATIONS, Mon 10Dec.07
To: Shannon@saintpaulchamber.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com... Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. ... The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, ... Eliminate ExcessiveConsumption/Inspections/Abatement, without Valid ...
City St.PaulBudgets -Constitutionally Challenged ... - Sharon4Council
https://sharon4council.blogspot.com › 2007/12 › city-stpaulbudgets-constit...
City St.PaulBudgets -Constitutionally Challenged by Sharon Anderson-BillDahn ... of the City and County Budgets, Excessive Consumption "Ordinance", etc. ... neglience , representing the Municipal Corporation, chartered City of St. Paul ..... LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: ...
Sharon Anderson Ward 2 - East Metro Voter Guide
www.eastmetrovoterguide.com › sharon-anderson-ward-2
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ... The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, ... The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case's challenge to the City's ... Eliminate ExcessiveConsumption/Inspections/Abatement, without Valid ...
Aug 16, 2019 - No person shall appear in any street or public place in a state of nudity, ... the limits of the City of Saint Paul, unless in some enclosed place out of view. .... certain kinds of solicitation, and not to limit constitutionally protected activity. ...... within the city, any loud, disturbing or excessive noise which would be ...
Missing: sharon4anderson challenge
City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 9/18/2019 at 3:30 PM ... 1983 Challenge Tax exempt up to 2019 .... without Quiet Titles, Marketable and Valid Complaints Naming Who,What and When DSI Inspectors? ... Constitutionality of Consent Agenda http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
probably 88 propertys involved ...
You visited this page on 8/19/19.
CC: AngelsAdvocates@aol.com, mayor@ci.stpaul.mn.us ... http://citystpaul-ponzi- principal.blogspot.com/2016/12/widowmrssharonandersonconstitutionalcha.html ... Tel 651-776-5835 email sharon4anderson@aol.com .... is challenging St.Paul MN Building Inspector Ed Smith re RICO Excessive Consumption without Due ...
The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, ... by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case's challenge to the City's housing code, ... Eliminate Excessive Consumption/Inspections/Abatement, without Valid ... Housing,Taxes-Fees-Assessments,Enforce MN Constitution Art.X and III ...
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
No comments:
Post a Comment