Case Name
Date of Oral Argument
Case Number
Butler v. City of Saint Paul, et at.
9/3/2019
A18-0655
Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;
SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS
CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO
NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE
PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A19-0916
State Court Administrator's Office
(651) 296-2474 (phone)
(651) 297-5636 (fax)
(651) 296-2474 (phone)
(651) 297-5636 (fax)
Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Suite #: 135
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,Whistleblower
Name: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson
City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea
QUESTIONS
1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, based
on Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, trigge
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter.
2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directl
pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections.
a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro Quo
Almanac - Twin Cities PBS .
Almanac - Twin Cities PBS .
ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAIT
MN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait
3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Case
without MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned,
4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. Gallagher
The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges https://www.scribd.com/document/431378244/Administrative-Order-Membership2019
b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et al
Opinions-Unpublished?
Opinions-Unpublished?
postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction
Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea
Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia
Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia
Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are
OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking.
postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction
OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURT
FILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019
NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.
A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.
Ramsey County.
1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection.
2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.
Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.
Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record.
Phone: 651-266-8560
Fax: 651-266-8574
Phone: 651-266-8560
Fax: 651-266-8574
Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2
This contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.
52 Organizer Ramac Franklin Organize
| RES 19-1864 | 1 | 7 | Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax. | Resolution | Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax. |
| Ord 19-67 | 1 | 17 | Ordinance | Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020. |
xx
|
IN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw
Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S
50yrRestraining Orders
The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold.
http://dirtydakotacounty.blogspot.com/2019/09/corruption-proof-another-post-about.html
THE FEDERAL LAW SUIT BEGINS – (MISSING, POSTED 9/17/2013)
THE FEDERAL LAW SUIT BEGINS – (MISSING, POSTED 9/17/2013)
"Speechless Minnesota" also did an episode on the lawsuit: "2014/01/16 A U.S. Federal Court Hearing took place on Friday, January 10, 2013, at 2:00 PM on whether Judges sued individually are immune, even if they violate the civil rights of family members, by "temporarily" depriving them of their rights to their own children. Tim Kinley held a press conference in front of the court building before and after the court proceedings. Tim discussed the case and the interviews on this show."
Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com
(CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19.
Panel Three – Judge Tilsen
Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori Gildea
Minnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts
BlogItBabe
Panel One - Judge Asphaug
Panel Two - Judge Rancourt
Panel Three – Judge Tilsen
Minnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts
Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts
BlogItBabe
SandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildea
Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board of
re Dede Evavald
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
No comments:
Post a Comment